Competitive research

Database comparisons and performance benchmarks

Learn why Aerospike consistently surpasses competitors as a real-time, multi-model, NoSQL database in distributed cloud managed systems.

Redis vs. Aerospike

As workloads grow, Redis users often face rising costs, scalability issues, and operational complexity. Aerospike offers a more efficient, scalable, low-latency alternative for high-demand applications.

Cassandra vs. Aerospike

Aerospike offers significant cost efficiency, high uptime, and more predictable performance for real-time, mission-critical applications compared to Cassandra, making it ideal for scaling seamlessly.

MongoDB vs. Aerospike

Aerospike outperforms MongoDB in scalability, performance predictability on SSDs, and flexibility as both a cache and persistent store, making it ideal for large-scale applications.

Couchbase vs. Aerospike

Aerospike outperforms Couchbase with SSD-optimized storage, delivering predictable performance at scale and lower total costs, while Couchbase relies more on RAM.

ScyllaDB vs. Aerospike

Aerospike outperforms ScyllaDB with predictable high performance, optimized SSD use, lower operational costs, and versatile data models for real-time, large-scale applications​.

Aerospike on AWS

Aerospike on AWS supports high-performance, low-latency operational workloads with cost efficiency and scalability, making it ideal for real-time applications. It ensures consistent performance across demanding, mission-critical tasks.